Not sure if Infinity on the focus ring is correct. But good news, I don’t look at the ring when focusing anyways. And not going to mess with screws to “fix” it.
That’s the risk with cheap manual lenses apparently.
I don’t approve of Geometric distortion correction. Don’t want wide trees.
You can find their lens profiles here. If you have no Adobe crap, you can use the LCP profile in RawTherapee. I tried converting it with the LensFun script at first. But not compiling a newer LensFun. Might require then recompiling digikam.
No GPU acceleration, but doesn’t take long anyways.
Sometimes, the left side of the image doesn’t look very good. One image, that has a building with words on it, the words aren’t in focus. But I wasn’t focusing on that anyways.
Probably didn’t actually need to use f8 either.
I only remove the shade or vignetting. Easy way to make it brighter. Except, some of the images might look better with the shade. But easier to save a profile, and apply to all the RAW images.
And why are some of the images too dark?
How about because the camera thought 1/5000 sec was a great idea. Well, need to change camera to the S on the dial, instead of A. Can’t change aperture with the camera anyways.
And the image with the words not in focus, was 1/4000 sec. Probably the problem. But, it made the clouds look really cloudy. More cloudy then it probably was. Good photo of the sky. And now it’s brighter outside.
That’s the only motivation I have to go on a walk. Now I have to walk too far to take photos. Unless I just want to take the same photos every time.
One person on the path, was apparently walking by me, when focusing on a far away building. Luckily, I didn’t take their photo. I don’t take photos of strangers.
1/800 sec is too bright, without shade. ISO was 400 for all photos. Leave it at that, cause it’s the outdoor camera.
If I go to Amsterdam, I could take some night photos though.
1/2500 sec might have been a good shutter speed.
Apparently the camera can’t calculate the right shutter speed. I’d rather use the same shutter speed for the photos I was taking.
Also, I have only one requirement, the river should be in focus. Well, apparently, that isn’t the case with infinity focus.
The resize thing in Nomacs is annoying, just a “scale”. I’d rather enter a number.
That’s the only photo I can share. Somebody left a nice bag there.
Might need their 6mm f/2 .0 lens. It’s $200, does that mean it’s sharper? I wouldn’t use it at f/2.0, unless I was taking photos of an outdoor night orgy.
Meike has a 6.5mm f/2.0 lens for $120. I had to send a lens from them back once though. It was broken. And that’s the one I sent back.
Could get lucky. Couldn’t really test it much.
Too much fish eye with the Meike. There is a good photo on Amazon, you can see hair on her face.
I think some people like the TTArtisan 10mm F2. Might make more sense, then a 6mm. Then I don’t have to stand as close to the cliff.
If you look at images on Amazon reviews, that takes some good photos. But they probably used the correct shutter.
And not great for astrophotography, which is a bummer, cause it’s f/2.0.
There’s cheaper 10mm lenses, not f/2.0 probably. But if it has a star effect, why would I want to use it at night?
7artisans 10mm F3.5 is only $100. But might not be great, for outdoor night orgies.
It’s smaller then the 7.5mm though. That would be a good reason to get it.
Need a smaller camera bag, but can’t find one I want. I had a small camera bag or pouch. Might have been too small though.
I’m too lazy to look at every page on any site.